Jump to content
Hotmail and Outlook are blocking most of our emails at the moment. Please use an alternative provider when registering if possible until the issue is resolved.

golstat2003

Members
  • Posts

    2310
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by golstat2003

  1. Also we have a bajillion (slight exaggeration lmao) chat channels. The main socialization in COH doesn't come from teaming. Since quite a few pickup groups I team with sometimes don't even talk in team chat. Yet I see folks chatting away in LFG, Help, General, and the respective server channels.
  2. Also folks act like Incarnates are some beast that is inevitable for every level 50 or that they are something that you can't work around. Team leaders can do as you mention and also ask incarnates to unslot those powers. (They can actually be unslotted easier than enhancements, and changed to different powers easier than primary/secondary/pool powers). And if you (in general) don't even like the system, newsflash: don't craft the powers! I bet you money though, as you alude to, many more folks prefer incarnates as is (including using them as they see fit in ALL content, at ALL levels), than those that would be willing to unslot them. I don't consider this a problem that needs fixing at all.
  3. I find it a bit funny and somewhat shortsighted. Because without it, I know quite a few vets that would have left years before the shutdown on live. Myself included. It (Incarnates) extended the life of the game the same way the Invention system did on live at the time it came out, and the same way purples, pvp IOs and Attunded IOs did. And HC making it easier to get into those systems (including their seeding of the market to keep prices low) is one of the reasons I stuck with HC when the dam on rogues servers broke a year+ back. Each major system change extends the life of an mmo. It's either that or constant content updates. Costume changes alone would not have allowed COH to run as long as it did on live.
  4. The problems this would bring up outweigh any benefit by a mile or more. Sorry but its a no from me.
  5. Hmmm, one could argue IOs started us long down that path before Judgement and family came into existence. Especially with purples, attuned IOs, and the constant inclusion of Set IOs that gave new ways to get +recharge.
  6. That's kind of a naive view if that's what they said. At the time incarnate content needed large leagues to even start. (And to an extent still does). If I was expected to only play my incarnated characters in incarnate content, I wouldn't have ever bothered. And if Alpha were the only ability available in lvls 45-50 I would never have bothered starting the system on any character. I'm sorry but for most of my toons none of the alphas really provide anything impressive, especially with the inventions system. Alpha is a nice to have but is boring as hell for a system that is supposed to be the next level of power for our characters.
  7. Agreed. All incarnate powers should stay as is.
  8. Yeahhhh no. Let them continue to negotiate. Nothing wrong with that.
  9. Well no, at that point what HC has stays as is. Or you get a C&D.
  10. There is no hard deadline. They own the IP. They can take as long as they want.
  11. Yeah I distinctly remember Positron and a few others outright explaining this on the live forums. In fact I recall that for some time (and probably even near the end of the life of the live product) plugging values into excel was part of the work. (Though that might have only been for powers). EDIT: Bottom line if folks just gotta be patient and wait. I'm just glad HC is still up and running and hasn't been hit with any Cease and Decist. Grateful for "small" things like that.
  12. Actually it would help with the other thing that controllers can do -- debuffing. Which is extremely powerful. When I form teams and invite controllers, I'm not just seeking their control abilities. Especially since buffs and debuffs can be a force multiplier.
  13. Hmmmm, the majority don’t care if the game is too easy as long as they can hop on a team and play or can easily solo on their own. But this is a side discussion, and not really relevant to those who are looking for more challenge options.
  14. Assuming one thinks AOEs are a problem. I don’t think the majority of players think so.
  15. Well no. These new options we are discussing are supposed to be OPTIONAL difficulty settings. If you can do it as part of the difficulty settings for those who want to play the new “OMGBBQHaaardMode” sure. As an overall change to the base game, no. i think both of you are discussing such changes in regards to the first option-aka optional difficulty. Just want to make it clear yet again that the base game should stay as is. Most players don’t care for making the game harder just to make it harder.
  16. Hmmm. At 50 though thanks to incarnate abilities teams have stacking debuffs, so burning down hp/health and regen hasn’t been an issue there. At lower levels you have a point. But then I would not expect low level teams to use any such OPTIONAL difficulty settings. The plan ol +4/x8 and below will still exist. 😝
  17. I was just thinking about Propel when I read the thread title. Good point. I would be down with this as an actual suggestion using the Propel tech!
  18. As long as there is a screening process where HC themselves could block the submission, I have no issue. I don't trust anything having to do with user generated content. Not after the debacle that is AE. And if there are some existing offensive symbols, petition the GMs to have them removed. (I mean in general not specific to this poster).
  19. Next time use the full quote: Doesn't mean we should open the avenue to add more or ones that are EVEN MORE intolerant. With that said a review process that was mentioned above would prevent this, as it would give HC a chance to screen them.
  20. Doesn't mean we should open the avenue to add more or ones that are EVEN MORE intolerant. With that said a review process that was mentioned above would prevent this, as it would give HC a chance to screen them.
  21. Yeahhhhh no. I'll just leave this comment here to stand on it's own. Have fun.
  22. Actually that's not a bad idea. A review process would be a good screening tool.
  23. Which is why I said, IF it's only visible to the people who see the flag then fine. If it's visible to other folks no. The issue wasn't something crass. The issue was something that could be interpenetrated as racist.
  24. Yeah a merit reward would definitely be a good incentive.
  25. Thanks for the info. Seriously, at this point anyone asking me "can I play COH on my mac" my answer is going to be dual boot a VM of windows on your mac.
×
×
  • Create New...