ShardWarrior

I play Minecraft with the kids and will be heading back to Star Trek Online for the 10th Anniversary stuff.

Servers might be but the people running the pirated software on them are not unless you are suggesting they all up and move to Russia or wherever too. Just my own opinion here - I think it a far, far better solution to focus on becoming legally legitimate than worrying about having to constantly look over ones should and move around to "avoid the law". I would much prefer knowing that the game will be here tomorrow, the next day and years from now.

I have loved Stargate since the original film. I would have loved to have seen where the writers were going with the story on SGU. Sadly, we will never know. I can see how changing the (successful) formula up did the show in.

Cease and desist letters do not cost a fortune.

Posting this here and driving even more traffic to his channel seems counterproductive to me.

The code being in the wild does not mean NCSoft cannot shut the game down wherever it may crop up should they choose to do so. Once word is out, hosting providers may not even allow it to be run on their servers. Until the game gets an official legal blessing from the owner, it is in danger. I tend to agree the main focus should be on getting legal permission before looking to anything else.

I have seen it on rare occasions where there is no aggro management. I seem to remember him doing this when the game was live though.

I liked it too. I was sad to see it get cancelled. I soooooo wanted to see where they went with this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHmr80Bf0zg I remember being blown away first time Destiny did a sun dive in "Light". Loved the music in this scene. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhAYMnLso2k

Was anyone using Taunt?

To be fair this same thing has been said for every incarnation of Star Trek since TNG was first announced. This is one of the great things about the Trek IP - it has something for everyone. The newer stuff may not be to our liking or it may be our new favorite. Fans have their favorite series, ship, Captain, episode etc. Picard and Discovery are not any different.

This is what respecs are for. Part of learning the game is making mistakes which can later be corrected or fine tuned with the respec process.

If someone would want to intentionally do this, why not let them?

Perhaps to have redundancy in case of technical issues? There are any number of reasons for it and I am sure we will be finding out why.

Ok so after much futzing and experimenting I think I figured out a way to work with the roman awnings. It is not perfect, but I think it will work. This is for (one of) my personal SG projects; The Dojo of the Crimson Dragon. Concept it is a temple nestled in the woods next to a mountain lake. Not all finished yet, but here are few progress shots - For the transport hub, I built a dock on the lake and used rowboats. The workshop will be an outdoor forge Will post some more photos when I have it done.

Porting the Storm Kick animation from Martial Combat to Martial Arts and vice versa.

That is not what I said. The command is not going to be around forever. Follow the Homecoming staff on the forums if you want to see what they have posted on the subject. There have been a couple of threads and posts about it. Since you probably will not do the work yourself, here is one of them- Nor am I trying to police the forums. The information is out there, you just need to put in the time and effort to find it.

I liked Picard as well. Very nice setup for the first season. Calling it now - Spiner will return as (non flashback) Data season 2 or 3.

The Homecoming folk have said they will be keeping the slash command around until they can create a suitable replacement. No reason for fear mongering. People are already aware the code as it exists at present will be going away at some point.

If you would like to have pissing contests over what words mean, I am happy to do that. However, I would suggest it be take to PMs instead of further derailing the thread.

I would not mind seeing the addition of gimmicky type stuff added to some of the older sets. CO has lunge which is not dissimilar to Feral Leap. As for MA being "high mobility", I think that would depend on what source you are drawing from.

Not using those exact words, no. The term "lack of" generally means missing or a lack of something, which in the case of AoE and MA is false. MA has an AoE with Dragons Tail, so saying it is "lacking AoE" is a bit of a misnomer. It stands to reason that someone saying the set lacks AoE when it has an AoE in it, it would mean the person is looking for more AoE. Not difficult to understand.

And yet the criticism was expressly said to be a lack of AoE. It seems to me if one is looking for a lot of AoE damage, they would have chosen something other than a set designed to be for single target.

Why are you expecting a single target set to be full of AoE?

I feel MA is perfectly fine as is and is in no need of "fixing". This is because MA is meant to be a single target set. As for the stuns, they are meant to work in concert with one another, not alone. Use TK > CS > EC and you will have everything short of AVs in perma stun. Once you have them stunned, they are very easily contained from doing the drunk walk with CAK. The teleporting kick animation exists in CO and at least to me, it looks silly.

Love this one!